Skip to main content

Table 3 Similarity between the V3 16S and other datasets

From: Analysis of the salivary microbiome using culture-independent techniques

Datasets to which the F and R 30-cycle V3 subsets were compared Average similaritya ± SD (%) Pearson's correlation coefficient (F, R)b
Itself (F vs R) 94.8 0.998
25-cycle V3 97.1 ± 0.3 0.998, 0.999
20-cycle V3 93.2 ± 1.5 0.974, 0.977
30-cycle V1 82.7 ± 0.8 0.987, 0.990
16S-WGS 68.5 ± 3.7 0.933, 0.958
WGS 64.1 ± 0.5 0.650, 0.652
V3 from other individualsc 64.8 ± 3.5 0.453-0.871, 0.458-0.867
  1. F, forward run; R, reverse run.
  2. a The genera frequency were square-root transformed and used to construct the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix. When applicable, the similarities were calculated separately for the pairs of forward and the pairs of reversed subsets prior to averaging.
  3. b Based on untransformed data.
  4. c Samples 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 from a previous study [21] in which the initial PCR cycles were carried out in the same conditions as those in the present work. Then, 28 cycles were performed using bar-coded primers and the amplicons were sequenced by the Roche/454 platform. The average similarity observed among these five microbiomes was 65.2 ± 7.2%.