Open Access

RNA interference against polo-like kinase-1 in advanced non-small cell lung cancers

Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics20111:6

DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-6

Received: 16 October 2010

Accepted: 20 January 2011

Published: 20 January 2011

Abstract

Worldwide, approximately one and a half million new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed each year, and about 85% of lung cancer are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the molecular pathogenesis underlying NSCLC is understood, new molecular targeting agents can be developed. However, current therapies are not sufficient to cure or manage the patients with distant metastasis, and novel strategies are necessary to be developed to cure the patients with advanced NSCLC.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a phenomenon of sequence-specific gene silencing in mammalian cells and its discovery has lead to its wide application as a powerful tool in post-genomic research. Recently, short interfering RNA (siRNA), which induces RNAi, has been experimentally introduced as a cancer therapy and is expected to be developed as a nucleic acid-based medicine. Recently, several clinical trials of RNAi therapies against cancers are ongoing. In this article, we discuss the most recent findings concerning the administration of siRNA against polo-like kinase-1 (PLK-1) to liver metastatic NSCLC. PLK-1 regulates the mitotic process in mammalian cells. These promising results demonstrate that PLK-1 is a suitable target for advanced NSCLC therapy.

Introduction

Worldwide, approximately one and a half million new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed each year [1]. About 85% of lung cancer are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and large cell carcinoma [2], and NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Surgery is generally regarded as the best strategy for lung cancers. However, only 30% of patients are suitable for receiving potentially curative resection [3], and it is necessary for other patients to be treated with chemotherapy. As we gain a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis underlying NSCLC, new molecular targeting agents can be developed. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as gefitinib and erlotinib, have shown remarkable activity in the patients with NSCLC, and particularly these TKIs are more effective to NSCLC with EGFR mutations in 19 exon (in-frame deletions) and exon 21 (L858R point mutation), which are found to be more prevalent in Asian patients [4, 5]. However, despite the development of new TKIs, new mutations in EGFR exon 20, developing resistance to EGFR TKIs, have emerged in the treated NSCLC [6, 7], and current therapies are not sufficient to cure or manage the patients with distant metastasis [8, 9]. Therefore, novel strategies are necessary to be developed so that the patients with NSCLC can be cured.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a process of sequence specific post-transcriptional gene silencing induced by double-strand RNA (dsRNA) and this phenomenon was discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) [10]. RNAi has been shown to function in higher organisms including mammals, and methods that exploit RNAi mechanisms have been developing. RNAi has now been well-established as a method for experimental analyses of gene function in vitro as well as in high-throughput screening, and recently, RNAi has been experimentally introduced into cancer therapy. To apply the RNAi phenomenon to therapeutics, it is important to select suitable targets for the inhibition of cancer progression and also to develop effective drug delivery systems (DDSs). Recently a lot of useful non-viral DDSs for small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have been developed [1117]. Besides selecting suitable targets, an important consideration for siRNA-mediated treatment is to predict and avoid off-target effects, which are the silencing of an unintended target gene, and potential immunostimulatory responses. To avoid those effects, the most specific and effective siRNA sequence must be validated. Modification of two nucleosides of the sense strand also completely co-inhibited the immunological activities of the antisense strand, while the silencing activity of the siRNA was maintained [18].

Polo-like kinase-1 (PLK-1) belongs to the family of serine/threonine kinases and regulates cell division in the mitotic phase [19, 20]. PLK-1 is overexpressed in many types of malignancies and its overexpression is associated with poor prognosis of cancer patients [21, 22]. In this review, we discuss possible RNAi strategies against PLK-1 in advanced lung cancers.

Mechanisms of RNAi

The precise mechanisms of RNAi are discussed in several reviews [2325]. In the initiation phase of RNAi processes, following introduction of dsRNA into a target cell, dsRNA is processed into shorter lengths of 21-23 nucleotides (nts) dsRNAs, termed siRNAs, by the ribonuclease activity of a dsDNA-specific RNAse III family ribonuclase Dicer. Dicer consists of an N-terminal helicase domain, an RNA-binding Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille (PAZ) domain, two tandem RNAse III domains, and a dsRNA-binding domain [26, 27]. Mammals and nematodes have only a single Dicer, which acts to produce both siRNAs and miRNAs [2830], while other organisms have multiple Dicers which perform separate, specialized functions. Drosophila has two Dicers: Drosophila Dicer-1 is required for generating miRNAs, whereas Drosophila Dicer-2 produces siRNAs [25, 31]. dsRNA precursors are sequentially processed by the two RNAse III domains of Dicer, and cleaved into smaller dsRNAs with 3' dinucleotide overhangs [26, 32].

In the second effector phase, smaller dsRNAs enter into an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) assembly pathway [33]. RISC contains Argonaute (Ago) proteins, a family of proteins characterized by the presence of a PAZ domain and a PIWI domain [34]. The PAZ domain recognizes the 3' terminus of RNA, and the PIWI domain adopts an RNAse H-like structure that can catalyze the cleavage of the guide strand. Most species have multiple Ago proteins, but only Ago2 can cleave its RNA target in humans. The dsRNA is unwound by ATP-dependent RNA helicase activity to form two single-strands of RNA. The strand that directs silencing is called the guide strand, and the other is called the passenger strand. Ago2 protein selects the guide strand and cleaves its RNA target at the phosphodiester bond positioned between nucleotides 10 and 11 [32, 35]. The resulting products are rapidly degraded because of the unprotected ends, and the passenger strand is also degraded [36, 37]. The targeted RNA dissociates from the siRNA after the cleavage, and the RISC cleaves additional targets, resulting in decrease of expression of the target gene (Figure 1) [38].
Figure 1

Mechanisms of RNA interference. After the introduction of dsRNA into a target cell, the dsRNA is processed into siRNA length of 21-23 nucletides by Dicer. siRNA then enters an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) assembly pathway. The dsRNA unwinds to form two single-strands of RNA. The passenger strand rapidly degrades and the guide strand binds and cleaves the target mRNA, resulting in mRNA degradation.

Polo-like kinase-1

To develop RNAi therapy against cancers, it is essential that suitable gene targets are selected. Such targets include antiapoptotic proteins, cell cycle regulators, transcription factors, signal transduction proteins, and factors associated with malignant biological behaviors of cancer cells. All of these genes are associated with the poor prognosis of cancer patients. PLKs belong to the family of serine/threonine kinases and are highly conserved among eukaryotes. PLK family has identified PLK-1, PLK-2 (SNK), PLK-3 (FNK), and PLK-4 (SAK) in mammalians so far and PLKs function as regulators of both cell cycle progression and cellular response to DNA damage [19, 3941]. PLK-1 has an N-terminal serine/threonine protein kinase domain and two polo box domains at the C-terminal region. Polo box domains regulate the kinase activity of PLK-1 [21, 42]. PLK-1 regulates cell division at several points in the mitotic phase: mitotic entry through CDK1 activation, bipolar spindle formation, chromosome alignment, segregation of chromosomes, and cytokinesis [19, 43]. PLK-1 gene expression is regulated during cell cycle progression, with a peak level occurring at M phase. Similar to its gene expression, PLK-1 protein expression and its activity are low in G0, G1, and S phases, and begin to increase in G2 phase with peak in M phase [4447].

Whereas PLK-1 is scarcely detectable in most adult tissues [45, 48, 49], PLK-1 is overexpressed in cancerous tissues. Its expression levels were tightly correlated with histological grades of tumors, clinical stages, and prognosis of the patients. PLK-1 mRNA levels were elevated in NSCLC tissues and this transcript levels were correlated with the survivals of cancer patients [50]. Moreover, the immunohistoligical study showed that PLK-1 protein was overexpressed in NSCLC tissues in patients at progressed stages of cancer (postsurgical stage ≥II) and in patients with poorly differentiated NSCLCs [51]. Patients with urinary bladder cancers expressing high levels of PLK-1 have a poor prognosis compared with patients with its low expression. Moreover, the histologically high-grade, deeply invasive, lymphatic-invasive, and venous-invasive bladder cancers demonstrated significantly higher PLK-1 expression [52]. As PLK-1 is overexpressed in other various cancers [21], PLK-1 overexpression is a prognostic biomarker for cancer patients.

Inhibition of PLK-1 activity induces mitotic arrest and tumor cell apoptosis [5355]. Depletion of PLK-1 mRNA also inhibits the functions of PLK-1 protein in DNA damages and spindle formation and causes the inhibition of the cell proliferation in a time- and a dose-dependent manner. PLK-1 siRNA treatment induces an arrest at the G2/M phase in the cell cycle with the increase of CDC2/Cyclin B1 [51, 52, 56, 57]. PLK-1 siRNA-transfected cells had dumbbell-like and misaligned nuclei, indicating that PLK-1 depletion induced abnormalities of cell division during M phase, and these cells were shown to yield to caspase-dependent apoptosis [51, 52, 56]. As mentioned above, the kinases of PLK family cooperatively act in mitosis. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR data showed that PLK-2 and PLK-3 transcripts were increased after PLK-1 siRNA treatment [51]. Unlike PLK-1, PLK-2 and PLK-3 play inhibitory roles. PLK-2 is regulated by p53 and PLK-3 is activated by the DNA damage checkpoint [40]. These observations suggest that PLK-1 depletion induced mitotic catastrophe and activation of spindle checkpoint and DNA damage checkpoint, resulting in increased transcription of PLK-2 and PLK-3. Consequently, these PLK family kinases cooperatively prevented G2/M transition and induction of apoptosis. Importantly, depletion of PLK-1 does not affect the proliferation of normal cells although PLK-1 plays an important role in cell division [51, 53, 58]. This suggests that some other kinases compensate loss of PLK-1 function during mitosis in normal cells [51, 58]. Collectively, PLK-1 could be an excellent target for cancer therapy.

Atelocollagen

Although siRNA target molecules are overexpressed in cancer cells, most of them are essential to maintain homeostasis of physiological functions in humans. Therefore, siRNAs must be delivered selectively into cancer cells. Moreover, naked siRNAs are degraded by endogenous nucleases when administered in vivo, so that delivery methods that protect siRNAs from such degradation are essential. For these reasons, safer and more effective DDSs must be developed. DDSs are divided into two categories: viral vector based carriers, and non-viral based carriers. Viral vectors are highly efficient delivery systems and they are the most powerful tools for transfection so far. However, viral vectors have several critical problems in in vivo application. Especially, retroviral and lentiviral vectors have major concerns of insertional mutagenesis [59, 60]. Consequently, non-viral DDSs have been strenuously developed [1113].

Atelocollagen, one of powerful non-viral DDSs, is type I collagen obtained from calf dermis [61]. The molecular weight of atelocollagen is approximately 300,000 and the length is 300 nm. It forms a helix of 3 polypeptide chains. Amino acid sequences at the N- and C-termini of the collagen molecules are called telopeptide, and they have antigenecity of collagen molecules. As the telopeptide is removed from collagen molecules by pepsin treatment, atelocollagen shows low immunogenicity. Therefore, atelocollagen has been shown to be a suitable biomaterial with an excellent safety profile and it is used clinically for a wide range of purposes. Atelocollagen is positively charged, which enable binding to negatively charged nucleic acid molecules, and bind to cell membranes. Moreover, at low temperature atelocollagen exists in liquid form, which facilitates easy mixing with nucleic acid solutions. The size of the atelocollagen-nucleic acid complex can be varied by altering the ratio of siRNA to atelocollagen. Because atelocollagen naturally forms a fiber-like structure under physiological conditions, particles formed a high concentration of atelocollagen persist for an extended period of time at the site of introduction, which is advantageous to achieve a sustained release of the associated nucleic acid. Atelocollagen is eliminated through a process of degradation and absorption similar to the metabolism of endogenous collagen [61]. Alternatively, particles formed under conditions of low atelocollagen concentrations result in siRNA/atelocollagen complexes approximately 100-300 nm in size that are suitable for systemic delivery by intravenous administration. Atelocollagen complexes protect siRNA from degradation by nucleases and are transduced efficiently into cells, resulting in long-term gene silencing. For instance, Takeshita et al. demonstrated that the systemic siRNA delivery with atelocollagen existed intact for at least 3 days in tumor tissues using a mouse model [62].

Preclinical application of RNAi therapy against PLK-1 in a murine advanced lung cancer model

Here we introduce an application of PLK-1 siRNA against an advanced lung cancer. As described above, PLK-1 is overexpressed in NSCLC tumors. Liver metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in lung cancer patients [8, 9, 63, 64]. However, despite the development of new chemotherapeutic and molecular targeting agents, current therapies are not sufficient to inhibit liver metastasis. We investigated the effects of PLK-1 siRNA on the liver metastasis of lung cancers using atelocollagen as a DDS. We first established a mouse model of liver metastasis. Spleens were exposed to allow direct intrasplenic injections of Luciferase (Luc)-labeled A549 NSCLC cells. Ten minutes after injections of tumor cells, the spleens were removed. After Luc-labeled A549 cell engraftment was confirmed by using In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) of bioluminescence imaging [65], PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex, nonsense siRNA/atelocollagen complex, or PBS/atelocollagen complex was administered by intravenous injection for 10 consecutive days following day 1 of transplantation. On day 35, mice treated with nonsense siRNA/atelocollagen complex or PBS/atelocollagen complex showed extensive metastases in the liver when compared to mice treated with PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex (Figure 2). Moreover, on day 70 after the inoculation of tumor cells, livers of mice treated with nonsense siRNA/atelocollagen or PBS/atelocollagen complex had numerous large tumor nodules, whereas the livers of mice treated with PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex showed a much lower number of smaller nodules. These findings indicate that PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex is an attractive therapeutic tool for further development as a treatment against liver metastasis of lung cancer [51]. Consequently, our preclinical applications suggest that PLK-1 siRNA is a promising tool for cancer therapy.
Figure 2

Application of PLK-1 RNAi therapy against liver metastatic NSCLC (cited from [51]). A. PBS/atelocollagen complex, nonsense siRNA/atelocollagen complex, or PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex was administered by intravenous injection. Representative mice showing bioluminescence after siRNA treatment. The photon counts of each mouse are indicated by the pseudocolor scales. B. Growth curves of inoculated Luc-labeled A549 cells measured by the IVIS (pink square, nonsense siRNA/atelocollagen complex (25 μg siRNA)-treated mice; blue diamond, PBS/atelocollagen complex-treated mice; orange triangle, PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen complex (25 μg siRNA)-treated mice; n = 5 for each group. On day 35 after inoculation, the luminesecence in the PLK-1 siRNA/atelocollagen-treated mice was significantly suppressed compared with that in other groups. * p < 0.05. Mean ± SD. C. Macroscopic analysis of mice livers after day 70 of inoculation. White nodules are metastatic liver tumors. Treatment with PLK-1 siRNA (25 μg) remarkably inhibited the growth of liver metastases compared with PBS or nonsense siRNA treatments (25 μg).

Conclusion

Our preclinical studies demonstrated that RNAi therapy against PLK-1 using atelocollagen is effective against liver metastatic NSCLC cancers. Recently, several clinical trials for cancer therapy are ongoing (Additional file 1: Table S1, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home). Although RNAi shows excellent specificity in gene-silencing, several adverse effects including activation of immune reaction [66, 67] and off-target effects (induction of unintended gene silencing) [68] are brought in in vivo application. Safer and more efficient DDSs for systemic delivery are warranted to be developed. Moreover, studies to establish the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of siRNAs on the administration are necessary steps in the potential approval of siRNA as a tool for cancer therapy. To maximize efficacy and to minimize adverse effects of RNAi, it should be determined whether siRNAs are best administered alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents [69, 70], and whether it is better to administer a single specific siRNA or multiple specific siRNAs [57, 7173]. In conclusion, RNAi therapy represents a powerful strategy against advanced lung cancers and may offer a novel and attractive therapeutic option. The success of RNAi depends on the suitable selection of target genes and the development of DDSs. We anticipate that the continued development of effective DDSs and the accumulation of evidence further proving the success of siRNA treatment will advance RNAi as a promising strategy for lung cancer therapy.

Lists of abbreviations

Ago: 

Argonaute

DDSs: 

drug delivery systems

dsRNA: 

double-strand RNA

EGFR: 

epidermal growth factor receptor

IVIS: 

In Vivo Imaging System

Luc: 

Luciferase

NSCLC: 

non-small cell lung cancer

nt: 

nucleotide

PAZ: 

Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille

PLK-1: 

Polo-like kinase-1

RISC: 

RNA-induced silencing complex

RNAi: 

RNA interference

siRNA: 

small interfering RNA

TKI: 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aids for Scientific Research from the Ministry of the Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital
(2)
Division of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital
(3)
Department of Molecular Cell Physiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Visbal AL, Leighl NB, Feld R, Shepherd FA: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest. 2005, 128: 2933-2943. 10.1378/chest.128.4.2933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rudd R: Chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-lung cancer. Respiratory Disease in Practice. 1991, 7: 12-14.Google Scholar
  4. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 169-181. 10.1038/nrc2088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oxnard GR, Miller VA: Use of erlotinib or gefitinib as initial therapy in advanced NSCLC. Oncology (Williston Park). 2010, 24: 392-399.Google Scholar
  6. Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Janne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Eck MJ, Tenen DG, Halmos B: EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 786-792. 10.1056/NEJMoa044238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H: Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e73-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bremnes RM, Sundstrom S, Aasebo U, Kaasa S, Hatlevoll R, Aamdal S: The value of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: results from a randomised multicenter study with minimum 5 year follow-up. Lung Cancer. 2003, 39: 303-313. 10.1016/S0169-5002(02)00508-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoang T, Xu R, Schiller JH, Bonomi P, Johnson DH: Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on eastern cooperative oncology group data. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 175-183. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998, 391: 806-811. 10.1038/35888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bumcrot D, Manoharan M, Koteliansky V, Sah DW: RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs. Nat Chem Biol. 2006, 2: 711-719. 10.1038/nchembio839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weichert W, Denkert C, Schmidt M, Gekeler V, Wolf G, Kobel M, Dietel M, Hauptmann S: Polo-like kinase isoform expression is a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90: 815-821. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601610.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oh YK, Park TG: siRNA delivery systems for cancer treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009, 61: 850-862. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ochiya T, Takahama Y, Nagahara S, Sumita Y, Hisada A, Itoh H, Nagai Y, Terada M: New delivery system for plasmid DNA in vivo using atelocollagen as a carrier material: the Minipellet. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 707-710. 10.1038/9560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Song E, Zhu P, Lee SK, Chowdhury D, Kussman S, Dykxhoorn DM, Feng Y, Palliser D, Weiner DB, Shankar P, et al: Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 709-717. 10.1038/nbt1101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zimmermann TS, Lee AC, Akinc A, Bramlage B, Bumcrot D, Fedoruk MN, Harborth J, Heyes JA, Jeffs LB, John M, et al: RNAi-mediated gene silencing in non-human primates. Nature. 2006, 441: 111-114. 10.1038/nature04688.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG: Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009, 8: 129-138. 10.1038/nrd2742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Judge AD, Bola G, Lee AC, MacLachlan I: Design of noninflammatory synthetic siRNA mediating potent gene silencing in vivo. Mol Ther. 2006, 13: 494-505. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barr FA, Sillje HH, Nigg EA: Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5: 429-440. 10.1038/nrm1401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Strebhardt K: Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 643-660. 10.1038/nrd3184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Strebhardt K, Ullrich A: Targeting polo-like kinase 1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 321-330. 10.1038/nrc1841.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Takai N, Hamanaka R, Yoshimatsu J, Miyakawa I: Polo-like kinases (Plks) and cancer. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 287-291. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghildiyal M, Zamore PD: Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 94-108. 10.1038/nrg2504.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin SE, Caplen NJ: Applications of RNA interference in mammalian systems. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007, 8: 81-108. 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.080706.092424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomari Y, Zamore PD: Perspective: machines for RNAi. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 517-529. 10.1101/gad.1284105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ: Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 2001, 409: 363-366. 10.1038/35053110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Collins RE, Cheng X: Structural domains in RNAi. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579: 5841-5849. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.07.072.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutvagner G, McLachlan J, Pasquinelli AE, Balint E, Tuschl T, Zamore PD: A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science. 2001, 293: 834-838. 10.1126/science.1062961.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Grishok A, Pasquinelli AE, Conte D, Li N, Parrish S, Ha I, Baillie DL, Fire A, Ruvkun G, Mello CC: Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing. Cell. 2001, 106: 23-34. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00431-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ketting RF, Fischer SE, Bernstein E, Sijen T, Hannon GJ, Plasterk RH: Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 2654-2659. 10.1101/gad.927801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee YS, Nakahara K, Pham JW, Kim K, He Z, Sontheimer EJ, Carthew RW: Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways. Cell. 2004, 117: 69-81. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00261-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Elbashir SM, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T: RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 188-200. 10.1101/gad.862301.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hammond SM, Bernstein E, Beach D, Hannon GJ: An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature. 2000, 404: 293-296. 10.1038/35005107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker JS, Barford D: Argonaute: A scaffold for the function of short regulatory RNAs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006, 31: 622-630. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Elbashir SM, Martinez J, Patkaniowska A, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T: Functional anatomy of siRNAs for mediating efficient RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster embryo lysate. Embo J. 2001, 20: 6877-6888. 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6877.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matranga C, Tomari Y, Shin C, Bartel DP, Zamore PD: Passenger-strand cleavage facilitates assembly of siRNA into Ago2-containing RNAi enzyme complexes. Cell. 2005, 123: 607-620. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ, Hammond SM, Joshua-Tor L, Hannon GJ: Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004, 305: 1437-1441. 10.1126/science.1102513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ashihara E, Kawata E, Maekawa T: Future prospect of RNA interference for cancer therapies. Curr Drug Targets. 2010, 11: 345-360. 10.2174/138945010790711897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Clay FJ, McEwen SJ, Bertoncello I, Wilks AF, Dunn AR: Identification and cloning of a protein kinase-encoding mouse gene, Plk, related to the polo gene of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 4882-4886. 10.1073/pnas.90.11.4882.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Eckerdt F, Yuan J, Strebhardt K: Polo-like kinases and oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 267-276. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Winkles JA, Alberts GF: Differential regulation of polo-like kinase 1, 2, 3, and 4 gene expression in mammalian cells and tissues. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 260-266. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jang YJ, Ma S, Terada Y, Erikson RL: Phosphorylation of threonine 210 and the role of serine 137 in the regulation of mammalian polo-like kinase. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 44115-44120. 10.1074/jbc.M202172200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. van de Weerdt BC, Medema RH: Polo-like kinases: a team in control of the division. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5: 853-864. 10.4161/cc.5.8.2692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Alvarez B, Martinez AC, Burgering BM, Carrera AC: Forkhead transcription factors contribute to execution of the mitotic programme in mammals. Nature. 2001, 413: 744-747. 10.1038/35099574.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lake RJ, Jelinek WR: Cell cycle- and terminal differentiation-associated regulation of the mouse mRNA encoding a conserved mitotic protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 7793-7801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee KS, Yuan YL, Kuriyama R, Erikson RL: Plk is an M-phase-specific protein kinase and interacts with a kinesin-like protein, CHO1/MKLP-1. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15: 7143-7151.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Uchiumi T, Longo DL, Ferris DK: Cell cycle regulation of the human polo-like kinase (PLK) promoter. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 9166-9174. 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Golsteyn RM, Schultz SJ, Bartek J, Ziemiecki A, Ried T, Nigg EA: Cell cycle analysis and chromosomal localization of human Plk1, a putative homologue of the mitotic kinases Drosophila polo and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc5. J Cell Sci. 1994, 107 (Pt 6): 1509-1517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hamanaka R, Maloid S, Smith MR, O'Connell CD, Longo DL, Ferris DK: Cloning and characterization of human and murine homologues of the Drosophila polo serine-threonine kinase. Cell Growth Differ. 1994, 5: 249-257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolf G, Elez R, Doermer A, Holtrich U, Ackermann H, Stutte HJ, Altmannsberger HM, Rubsamen-Waigmann H, Strebhardt K: Prognostic significance of polo-like kinase (PLK) expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 1997, 14: 543-549. 10.1038/sj.onc.1200862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kawata E, Ashihara E, Kimura S, Takenaka K, Sato K, Tanaka R, Yokota A, Kamitsuji Y, Takeuchi M, Kuroda J, et al: Administration of PLK-1 small interfering RNA with atelocollagen prevents the growth of liver metastases of lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 2904-2912. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nogawa M, Yuasa T, Kimura S, Tanaka M, Kuroda J, Sato K, Yokota A, Segawa H, Toda Y, Kageyama S, et al: Intravesical administration of small interfering RNA targeting PLK-1 successfully prevents the growth of bladder cancer. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 978-985.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Spankuch-Schmitt B, Bereiter-Hahn J, Kaufmann M, Strebhardt K: Effect of RNA silencing of polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1) on apoptosis and spindle formation in human cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 1863-1877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gumireddy K, Reddy MV, Cosenza SC, Boominathan R, Baker SJ, Papathi N, Jiang J, Holland J, Reddy EP: ON01910, a non-ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor of Plk1, is a potent anticancer agent. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 275-286. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Steegmaier M, Hoffmann M, Baum A, Lenart P, Petronczki M, Krssak M, Gurtler U, Garin-Chesa P, Lieb S, Quant J, et al: BI 2536, a potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1, inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 316-322. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu X, Erikson RL: Polo-like kinase (Plk)1 depletion induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 5789-5794. 10.1073/pnas.1031523100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Judge AD, Robbins M, Tavakoli I, Levi J, Hu L, Fronda A, Ambegia E, McClintock K, MacLachlan I: Confirming the RNAi-mediated mechanism of action of siRNA-based cancer therapeutics in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 661-673. 10.1172/JCI37515.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu X, Lei M, Erikson RL: Normal cells, but not cancer cells, survive severe Plk1 depletion. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 2093-2108. 10.1128/MCB.26.6.2093-2108.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Check E: A tragic setback. Nature. 2002, 420: 116-118. 10.1038/420116a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, von Kalle C, Schmidt M, Le Deist F, Wulffraat N, McIntyre E, Radford I, Villeval JL, Fraser CC, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Fischer A: A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 255-256. 10.1056/NEJM200301163480314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sano A, Maeda M, Nagahara S, Ochiya T, Honma K, Itoh H, Miyata T, Fujioka K: Atelocollagen for protein and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003, 55: 1651-1677. 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Takeshita F, Minakuchi Y, Nagahara S, Honma K, Sasaki H, Hirai K, Teratani T, Namatame N, Yamamoto Y, Hanai K, et al: Efficient delivery of small interfering RNA to bone-metastatic tumors by using atelocollagen in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 12177-12182. 10.1073/pnas.0501753102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 92-98. 10.1056/NEJMoa011954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilenbaum R, Johnson DH: Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2542-2550. 10.1056/NEJMoa061884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Nogawa M, Yuasa T, Kimura S, Kuroda J, Sato K, Segawa H, Yokota A, Maekawa T: Monitoring luciferase-labeled cancer cell growth and metastasis in different in vivo models. Cancer Lett. 2005, 217: 243-253. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Behlke MA: Progress towards in vivo use of siRNAs. Mol Ther. 2006, 13: 644-670. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Marques JT, Williams BR: Activation of the mammalian immune system by siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 1399-1405. 10.1038/nbt1161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jackson AL, Burchard J, Schelter J, Chau BN, Cleary M, Lim L, Linsley PS: Widespread siRNA "off-target" transcript silencing mediated by seed region sequence complementarity. Rna. 2006, 12: 1179-1187. 10.1261/rna.25706.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. von Bueren AO, Shalaby T, Oehler-Janne C, Arnold L, Stearns D, Eberhart CG, Arcaro A, Pruschy M, Grotzer MA: RNA interference-mediated c-MYC inhibition prevents cell growth and decreases sensitivity to radio- and chemotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 10-10.1186/1471-2407-9-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Shi Z, Liang YJ, Chen ZS, Wang XH, Ding Y, Chen LM, Fu LW: Overexpression of Survivin and XIAP in MDR cancer cells unrelated to P-glycoprotein. Oncol Rep. 2007, 17: 969-976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shi XH, Liang ZY, Ren XY, Liu TH: Combined silencing of K-ras and Akt2 oncogenes achieves synergistic effects in inhibiting pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009, 16: 227-236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Honma K, Iwao-Koizumi K, Takeshita F, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida T, Nishio K, Nagahara S, Kato K, Ochiya T: RPN2 gene confers docetaxel resistance in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 939-948. 10.1038/nm.1858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mu P, Nagahara S, Makita N, Tarumi Y, Kadomatsu K, Takei Y: Systemic delivery of siRNA specific to tumor mediated by atelocollagen: Combined therapy using siRNA targeting Bcl-xL and cisplatin against prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 2978-2990. 10.1002/ijc.24382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kawata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement