MicroRNAs: an emerging science in cancer epigenetics
© Kala et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 30 December 2012
Accepted: 4 February 2013
Published: 16 March 2013
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are remarkable molecules that appear to have a fundamental role in the biology of the cell. They constitute a class of non-protein encoding RNA molecules which have now emerged as key players in regulating the activity of mRNA. miRNAs are small RNAmolecules around 22 nucleotides in length, which affect the activity of specific mRNA, directly degrading it and/or preventing its translation into protein. The science of miRNAs holds them as candidate biomarkers for the early detection and management of cancer. There is also considerable excitement for the use of miRNAs as a novel class of therapeutic targets and as a new class of therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancers. From a clinical perspective, miRNAs can induce a number of effects and may have a diverse application in biomedical research. This review highlights the general mode of action of miRNAs, their biogenesis, the effect of diet on miRNA expression and the impact of miRNAs on cancer epigenetics and drug resistance in various cancers. Further we also provide emphasis on bioinformatics software which can be used to determine potential targets of miRNAs.
KeywordsmiRNA Biogenesis Diet Cancer epigenetics Bioinformatics software
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of endogenous small and noncoding RNAs that are approximately 18–25 nucleotides in length that play a critical role in the regulation of gene expression. In the past decade, the biological functions and biogenesis of miRNAs have become popular topics for biomedical research. As expected, miRNA expression is highly correlated with human diseases, such as cancer and other aging associated diseases. miRNAs may function not only as oncogenes but also as tumor suppressors, further implicating their roles as therapeutic targets. Moreover, miRNAs can be used as biomarker or prognostic signature molecules for determining the likely outcome of certain diseases such as cancer. The importance of these small non-coding RNA molecules in predicting the outcome of various cancers has been highlighted. Previous study on human patients emphasizes the substantial role of this relatively newly identified class of RNA molecules as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cancers .
miRNA biogenesis and its mode of action
RISC is composed of the transactivation-responsive RNA binding protein (TRBP) and Argonaute (Argo), the catalytic component of RISC complex. The guide strand can then recognize the complementary sequence of mRNA via its association with RISC. miRNA target recognition involves base-pairing between nucleotides 2–7 (the seed) of the 5′ end of the miRNAs and a 6, 7 or 8 nucleotide sequence of the mRNA 3′ UTR, with additional less absolute requirements [9, 10]. These include (1) the fidelity of seed base-pairing to short 3′ UTR motifs, (2) high A and U content in the nucleotides surrounding the seed-binding motif, (3) location of the 3′ UTR binding site at least 15 nucleotides past the stop codon, (4) seed-binding motif avoidance of any location near the center of a long 3′ UTR, and (5) seed-binding motif location close to supplemental UTR pairing with miRNA nucleotides 13–16 . Although it is known that a single species of miRNA can affect the expression levels of many genes, it is not yet clear how the specificity of this function of miRNAs is regulated. These non-coding RNA molecules are evolutionarily conserved and can be located in the introns or exons of genes, or in the sequence between genes (intergenic sequence) and are assumed to be involved in development, cell differentiation, metabolic pathways, signal transduction, proliferation, and apoptosis .
During the process of biogenesis there are a host of mechanisms that govern the transcription and post-transcriptional regulation of the miRNAs. The discovery of these mechanisms has enhanced our understanding of miRNA deregulation in a variety of disease states, including cancer, although much work remains for a more complete understanding of miRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression and downstream effects. Examples involve regulatory proteins Dicer and Drosha, with down-regulation of Dicer and Drosha believed to affect miRNA expression level and increase risk in neuroblastoma tumors. In fact, an important study has shown that in vitro knockdown of Dicer and Drosha promoted the growth of neuroblastoma cell lines .
Databases and software used in miRNA analysis
Database or software
miRNA target identification
Links to databases and software, such as miRanda
Accession number, name, keyword tissue, sequence PubMed ID
Identification of target genes or targeting miRNA. miRNA expression profile and distinguish conserved and non-canonical sites
Support vector regression (SVR) algorithm to determine level of gene down-regulation.
miRNA, target gene
miRNA target identification
Associate human diseases with specific miRNA dysregulation
Specific miRNA, disease name, tissue or target gene
Identify transcription factors that regulate specific miRNA
Links to NCBI gene and protein data and literature
Transcription factor names, miRNA name, species, regulation type, literature
Document experimentally confirmed miRNA-target interactions
Provides method of interaction confirmation, information on mature miRNA and precursor, expression profile, gene target network
Species, miRNA, target gene combination
Useful software for determining miRNA targets has now begun to proliferate [14–16]. Software of particular interest is miRanda, available at http://microrna.org or via miRBase (miRBase Targets) [15, 17, 18]. miRanda uses data from the genomic database Ensembl, available at http://www.ensembl.org/[17, 19], which allows a user to determine the target genes of a specific miRNA, the miRNAs for which a specific gene is a target and the expression profile of a specific miRNA . miRanda accommodates the identification of both conserved and nonconserved target sites which can be individually evaluated by the support vector regression (SVR) algorithm for degree and rank of capacity for gene down-regulation . The mirSVR algorithm was designed for ranking the level of down-regulation associated with miRandadesignated target sites according to miRNA transfection and inhibition experiments [9, 20]. The mirSVR scores, which simulate down-regulation predictions, were found to be especially valuable for recognizing gene down-regulation by multiple miRNAs, and they are provided on the miRanda website .
The database miR2Disease provides extensive inventory and documentation of involvement of miRNA dysregulation in human disease and is available at http://www.miR2Disease.org. As of the March 2011 update, miR2Disease provided comprehensive documentation of miRNA dysregulation of 349 miRNAs associated with 163 diseases including age-associated disease like cancer . Access is provided by search via specific miRNA, disease name (and associated tissue) or experimentally validated target gene (from TarBase). Detailed analysis is provided by links to referenced literature.
The database TransmiR, available at http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/transmir, documents miRNA regulation by transcription factors and thus provides a critical link to origins of gene dysregulation by miRNA and any consequent disease etiology . As of the March 2012 update, TransmiR documents 201 transcription factors and 209 miRNAs from 16 organisms . It can be assessed by combinations of transcription factor name, miRNA name, species, regulation type (activate or repress) and/or PubMedID. Links are provided to NCBI gene and protein data along with associated literature and networks of transcription factors and their target miRNA genes are included .
miRTarBase at http://miRTarBase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/ is an extensive database of experimentally confirmed miRNA-target interactions. These interactions are experimentally validated using Western blot, knockdown or reporter gene analysis . The miRTarBase database released in October 2011 included 669 miRNAs and 2553 target genes of 14 species . The networks of mature miRNA and gene targets appear to be suitable for potential integration with protein-protein interaction networks as well as network data derived from TransmiR [22, 23].
miRNAs and cancer epigenetics
miRNAs are emerging as a new class of molecules whose deregulation may ultimately contribute to cancer formation. They also likely cooperate with the other classic oncogenes and/or down-regulate tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells to drive the behavior of the tumors. Although many miRNAs have been shown to be deregulated in cancers, the set of miRNAs that actually play a pathogenic role in cancer has not yet been clearly determined. Additional changes in the expression level of miRNAs in cancer cell lines can directly regulate certain fundamental behaviors of cancer cells, such as proliferation and apoptosis . Many of the miRNAs deregulated in cancers have been shown to have a direct impact on tumor suppression and their metastasis. These non-coding classes of RNA can serve as useful biomarkers and may greatly improve clinical management by better defining appropriate treatment options for patients .
In addition to their role in tumor suppression or tumor promotion, miRNAs have also been identified as master regulators of key genes implicated in mechanisms of chemoresistance. There are two main mechanisms which are thought to be the key players in chemoresistance: one is genetic and the other is epigenetic. Although evidence regarding genetic changes following chemotherapeutic treatment is limited, numerous studies have demonstrated significant epigenetic alterations in drug-resistant cancer cells [25, 26]. In addition to these well-studied mechanisms of cancer drug resistance, there have been recent studies that link cancer drug resistance with the alteration of miRNAs expression .
Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression caused by mechanisms other than changes in the underlying DNA sequences, which might affect various cellular phenomena like cell signaling, proliferation, apoptosis. Epigenetic processes are commonly thought to favor cell survival and tumor progression. Examples of epigenetic changes are DNA methylation and histone modifications, both of which serve to regulate gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence [28, 29]. In order for DNA to undergo methylation and histone modifications, epigenetic modifying enzymes such as DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone acetylases (HAT) and histone demethylases (HDMs) are required. Interestingly, these miRNAs can control the expression of various epigenetic-modifying enzymes which are involved in carcinogenic processes [30, 31]. There are a number of studies highlighting this connection. One such study was performed by Lujambio et al. in 2008 which showed that hypermethylation of miR-148 resulted in its down-regulation because of positive feedback that exists to reinforce the overexpression of DNMTs in breast cancer cells which resulted in breast tumor growth and metastasis. Furthermore, the reactivation of miR-148 upon treatment with a DNA demethylating agent was associated with reduced tumor growth and inhibition of metastasis . Another study involved comparison between normal lung cell and cancerous cells and reported an expressional difference of miRNA in both the cell types . The miRNA-29 family (miRNA-29a,-29b,-29c), which is down-regulated in cancers, was shown to have some interesting complementarity with the 3′UTR of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)3A and 3B both of which are known de novo methyltransferases. Further investigation determined whether miR-29s could target DNMT3A and 3B expression by restoration of miR-29s. It was found that the enforced expression of miR-29s in lung cancer cell lines restored normal patterns of DNA methylation and induced re-expression of methylation-silenced tumor suppressor genes, thus affecting cancer growth .
miRNAs are implicated in several cellular responses to drug exposure, including, but not limited to, drug influx/efflux, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis, all of which mediate cancer cell survival and tumor progression. There have been a number of miRNAs which are reported to be involved in breast cancer drug resistance, one of which is miR-101, which targets EZH2, the enzyme responsible for trimethylating histone H3 lysine 27 to establish a repressive chromatin state. miRNA upregulation has been linked to tamoxifen and fulvestrant resistance [34, 35]. Crosstalk may occur between certain classes of miRNAs such as miR-101, miR-206, and miR-221/222, which translationally repress the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and could also be responsible for the decreased sensitivity to anti-estrogen drugs [27, 34, 35]. Further, on comparing ERα-negative breast cancer cells lines such as MDA-MB 468, HS578T and MDAMD-231 with ERα-positive cell lines such as MCF-7, T47D and MDA-MB 361, there was an expressional difference in miR-221 and miR-222. Further analysis revealed that knockdown of these two marker miRNAs partially restored ERα protein expression in ERα protein-negative/ mRNA-positive cells, thus making them a potential biomarker for prognostic as well as therapeutic purposes . These findings indicate a role for miRNAs in regulating estrogen receptor and drug resistance. Furthermore, since a number of miRNAs can target DNA and histone-modifying enzymes, they are likely to affect gene expression on a much broader scope.
The roles of miRNAs in cancers have been extensively investigated in the past few years. Recently, the connection of miRNA and tumor suppressor networks was elucidated. p53, a wellknown tumor suppressor, regulates diverse physical responses to many cancer-related stress signals, which may affect cell proliferation, cell death, DNA repair, and angiogenesis. Thus far results obtained are mixed. In some studies, p53 was found to affect miRNA expression and in other studies miRNAs were found to play a crucial role in p53-mediated tumor suppression . A wide array of miRNAs were found to be affected by the expression level of this key tumor suppressor gene, including in colon cancer were p53 may have a direct role in miRNA expression . In another study, 470 miRNAs were analyzed using microarray and 12 of these were found to be significantly affected by p53 . Moreover, it has been found that miR-34a affects the pathway that mediates cellular aging and limits longevity, by mitigating SIRT1 expression and p53-related apoptosis, stability and activity . SIRT1, a mammalian homologue of yeast silent information regulatory Sir2, with an enzymatic activity of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent histone deacetylases, is a class III histone deacetylase. miR-34a is a tumor suppressor gene that is an evolutionarily conserved miRNA, with a single, recognizable orthologue in several invertebrate species . miR-34a functions as a tumor suppressor, in part, through a SIRT1-p53 pathway. This miRNA inhibits SIRT1 expression through a miR-34a-binding site within the 3′ UTR of SIRT1. In support of this concept, it was discovered that miRNA did not affect the SIRT1 RNA transcription but it did affect the translation of SIRT1 RNA by acting on the 3′response element of SIRT-1 [39, 40]. Xu et al.  reported an effort to use softwares such as miRnada, TargetScan, and Pic Tar, which could help in target prediction for miR-22 and miR-34a. Moreover, knockdown of miR-34a function by antisense oligonucleotides attenuates the acetylation of p53. miR-34a may have other targets besides SIRT1 that can regulate cell survival. Thus, SIRT1 may be one of several distinct targets of miR-34a that contribute to its ability to promote apoptosis.
Recently, a study was performed with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant human colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells and with parental DLD-1 cells . In that study the level of miR-34a was observed to be low in the drug resistant cell line but it was found to be high in parental cells after treatment. Moreover with respect to SIRT-1 expression, miR-34a was observed to be upregulated in resistant cells. Further activation of miR-34a resulted in inhibition of growth with a decrease in Sirt1 expression. These findings suggest that miR-34a targeting the Sirt1 genes could negatively regulate, at least in part, the resistance to 5-FU in human colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells .
The miR-200 family is a crucial modulator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is a normal embryological process involved in various adult pathologies including cancer metastasis and tumorigenicity. The miR-200 family is down-regulated and exhibits tumor suppressive properties in renal, prostate, breast, bladder, pancreatic, and gastric cancers. It is a key regulator of the epithelial phenotype and is involved in EMT processes in breast cancer. There have been a crosslinking reported between Class III histone deacetylase SIRT1, a proposed oncogene in breast cancer, and miR-200. With overexpressed SIRT1 an overexpression of EMT was observed due to a positive feedback loop between epigenetically silenced miR-200 and SIRT1. Further restoration of miR-200 or the knockdown of SIRT1 prevented transformation of normal mammary epithelial cells as evidenced by decreased breast cancer metastasis. Finally, it was observed that SIRT1 overexpression is associated with decreased miR-200a in breast cancer patient samples, indicating that miR-200a may be a potential tumor suppression target in breast cancer metastasis . Several other class of miRNAs have also been associated with 3′UTR of SIRT1, such as miR-34a, miR-132, and miR-199a and this association is tissue specific and results in downregualtion of SIRT1 expression in colon, adipocyte, and cardiac tissues, respectively [39, 43]. Another study using gastric cancer cell in a mouse model, showed overexpression of miR-499 resulted in decreased expression of SIRT1 which resulted in 60% growth inhibition when compared with control. This was further shown using FACS analysis and β-Gal activity assays. Importantly, qPCR analysis also showed a loss of miR-499 expression in human clinical gastric tumor when compared with normal tissue . Moreover, SIRT-1 protein level was found to be higher in mouse embryonic stem cells when compared with mouse differentiated tissues. Certain classes of miRNAs such as miR-9, miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-204, miR-199b, miR-135, post-transcriptionally downregulate SIRT1 levels in differentiated tissues . Further, in support of a tumor suppressor role of miRNAs, a study was performed on T24 bladder cancer cells in which cells were treated with a DNA demethylating agent and HDAC inhibitors, which resulted in a decrease in DNA methylation and an increase in histone activation around the promoter region of the miR-127 gene. This ultimately lead to increased expression of miR-127 and tumor inhibition .
miRNA modification by diet
Growing evidence suggests that bioactive dietary components impact epigenetic processes and are often involved with the reactivation of tumor suppressor genes, activation of cell survival proteins, and induction of cellular apoptosis in many types of cancer [47–49]. Recent evidence suggests that bioactive dietary components can also target various oncogenic or tumor suppressive miRNAs to alter the gene expression profile in cancer prevention [50–52]. Genistein, an isoflavone isolated from soybeans, has been reported to have both preventive and therapeutic effects on carcinogenesis and many other diseases . One of the studies performed on ovarian cancer cells, which compared treated and non-treated cells, found that there were a total of 53 miRNAs which were differentially expressed in the cancer cells. Further, upon analyzing gene expression data using real time PCR, both ER-α and ER-β were observed to be induced in genistein-treated cells, which can correlate with the expression changes of these 53 miRNAs, hence revealing a significant reduction in migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Another investigation used dietary genistein for treatment of uveal melanoma cells and found a time-and dose-dependent inhibition which might be due to inhibition of miR-27a .
Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a naturally occurring flavinoid derived from the rhizome of Curcuma longa, has been reported to alter the expression of miRNAs. One such study performed by Sun et. al. found an upregulation of miRNA-22 and down-regulation of miRNA-199a in a pancreatic cancer cell line and a similar study was performed using curcumin in a breast cancer cell line which showed an upregulation of miRNA-15a and miRNA-16 using real time PCR analysis .
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is a major component of green tea and is thought to exert its anticancer effects by epigenetic mechanisms . Studies have shown that EGCG can inhibit epigenetic enzyme activity and thus can modulate apoptosis, the cell cycle and cell proliferation. Recently EGCG is also found to modulate miRNA expression. To further confirm this notion, a study was performed using hepatocellular carcinoma cells and it was found that there is an increase in miR-16 expression which resulted in apoptosis .
The effects of miRNA on target molecules
Target molecule in cancer
Effects on target molecule
miR-34a, miR-22, miR-499, miR-200, mi-9, miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-204, miR-199b, miR-135
miR-148, miR-29a, miR-29b, miR-29c
Overexpression of DNMTs
EZH2 histone lysine methyltransferase
Upregulated and causes drug resistance in breast cancer
miR-101, miR-206, miR-221/222
Silence information regulatory
RNA-induced silencing complex
Mouse embryonic stem cells
Support vector regression
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
Fluorescence activated cell sorter
Epithelial to mesenchymal transition
Polymerase chain reaction
This work was supported in part by grants from NCI (R01 CA129425), the American Institute for Cancer Research and a UAB CAS Interdisciplinary Award. Funding for RK and GWP was provided by the UAB Department of Biology; Funding for TMH was provided by NIH NIGMS 5K12GM088010 Noe (PI).
- Grady WM, Tewari M: The next thing in prognostic molecular markers: microRNA signatures of cancer. Gut. 2010, 59 (6): 706-708. 10.1136/gut.2009.200022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH, Kim VN: MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004, 23 (20): 4051-60. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600385.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Filippov V, Solovyev V, Filippova M, Gill SS: A novel type of RNase III family proteins in eukaryotes. Gene. 2000, 245 (1): 213-21. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00571-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snyder LL, Ahmed I, Steel LF: RNA polymerase III can drive polycistronic expression of functional interfering RNAs designed to resemble microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (19): e127-10.1093/nar/gkp657.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim VN, Han J, Siomi MC: Review Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 10 (2): 126-39. 10.1038/nrm2632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartel DP: Review MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004, 116 (2): 281-97. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS, Bartel DP: Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 2010, 466 (7308): 835-40. 10.1038/nature09267.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selbach M, Schwanhäusser B, Thierfelder N, Fang Z, Khanin R, Rajewsky N: Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature. 2008, 455 (7209): 58-63. 10.1038/nature07228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimson A, Farh KKH, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, Bartel DP: MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007, 27: 91-105. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP: Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005, 120: 15-20. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin RJ, Lin YC, Chen J, Kuo HH, Chen YY, Diccianni MB, London WB, Chang CH, Yu AL: MicroRNA signature and expression of Dicer and Drosha can predict prognosis and delineate risk groups in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2010, 70 (20): 7841-50. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0970.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ: MiRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D140-D144. 10.1093/nar/gkj112.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S: MiRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D152-D157. 10.1093/nar/gkq1027.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009, 136: 215-233. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C: The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D149-D153.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sethupathy P, Corda B, Hatzigeorgiou AG: TarBase: a comprehensive database of experimentally supported animal microRNA targets. RNA. 2006, 12: 192-197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ: MiRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D154-D158. 10.1093/nar/gkn221.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John B, Enright AJ, Aravin A, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS: Human microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2: e363-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hubbard TJP, Aken BL, Ayling S, Ballester B, Beal K, Bragin E, Brent S, Chen Y, Clapham P, Clarke L, Coates G, Fairley S, Fitzgerald S, Fernandez-Banet J, Gordon L, Graf S, Haider S, Hammond M, Holland R, Howe K, Jenkinson A, Johnson N, Kahari A, Keefe D, Keenan S, Kinsella R, Kokocinski F, Kulesha E, Lawson D, Longden I: Ensembl 2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D690-D697. 10.1093/nar/gkn828.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Betel D, Koppal A, Agius P, Sander C, Leslie C: Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites. Genome Biol. 2010, 11: R90-10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r90.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang Q, Wang Y, Hao Y, Juan L, Teng M, Zhang X, Li M, Wang G, Liu Y: miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D98-D104. 10.1093/nar/gkn714.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Lu M, Qiu C, Cui Q: TransmiR: a transcription factor-microRNA regulation database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: D119-D122. 10.1093/nar/gkp803.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsu S-D, Lin F-M, Wu W-Y, Liang C, Huang W-C, Chan W-L, Tsai W-T, Chen G-Z, Lee C-J, Chiu C-M, Chien C-H, Wu M-C, Huang C-Y, Tsou A-P, Huang H-D: MiRTarBase: a database curates experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D163-D169. 10.1093/nar/gkq1107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gaur A, Jewell DA, Liang Y, Ridzon D, Moore JH, Chen C, Ambros VR, Israel MA: Characterization of MicroRNA expression levels and their biological correlates in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 2456-2468. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2698.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker EK, Johnstone RW, Zalcberg JR, El-Osta A: Epigenetic changes to the MDR1 locus in response to chemotherapeutic drugs. Oncogene. 2005, 24 (54): 8061-75. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberti A, La Sala D, Cinti C: Multiple genetic and epigenetic interacting mechanisms contribute to clonally selection of drug-resistant tumors: current views and new therapeutic prospective. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 3: 571-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao JJ, Lin J, Yang H, Kong W, He L, Ma X, Coppola D, Cheng JQ: MicroRNA-221/222 negatively regulates estrogen receptor alpha and is associated with tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (45): 31079-86. 10.1074/jbc.M806041200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011, 144 (5): 646-74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pogribny IP, Beland FA: DNA hypomethylation in the origin and pathogenesis of human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66 (14): 2249-61. 10.1007/s00018-009-0015-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guil S, Esteller M: DNA methylomes, histone codes and miRNAs: trying it all together. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009, 41 (1): 87-95. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saito Y, Jones PA: Epigenetic activation of tumor suppressor microRNAs in human cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2006, 19: 2220-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lujambio A, Calin GA, Villanueva A, Ropero S, Sánchez-Céspedes M, Blanco D, Montuenga LM, Rossi S, Nicoloso MS, Faller WJ, Gallagher WM, Eccles SA, Croce CM, Esteller M: A microRNA DNA methylation signature for human cancer metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (36): 13556-61. 10.1073/pnas.0803055105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, Liu Z, Zanesi N, Callegari E, Liu S, Alder H, Costinean S, Fernandez-Cymering C, Volinia S, Guler G, Morrison CD, Chan KK, Marcucci G, Calin GA, Huebner K, Croce CM: MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009, 6: 616-21.Google Scholar
- Rao X, Di Leva G, Li M, Fang F, Devlin C, Hartman-Frey C, Burow ME, Ivan M, Croce CM, Nephew KP: MicroRNA-221/222 confers breast cancer fulvestrant resistance by regulating multiple signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2011, 30 (9): 1082-97. 10.1038/onc.2010.487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sachdeva M, Wu H, Ru P, Hwang L, Trieu V, Mo YY: MicroRNA-101-mediated Akt activation and estrogen-independent growth. Oncogene. 2011, 30 (7): 822-31. 10.1038/onc.2010.463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He L, He X, Lim LP, Stanchina E, Xuan Z, Liang Y: A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. 2007, 447 (7148): 1130-4. 10.1038/nature05939.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xi Y, Shalgi R, Fodstad O, Pilpel Y, Ju J: Differentially regulated micro-RNAs and actively translated messenger RNA transcripts by tumor suppressor p53 in colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12 (7): 2014-24. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1853.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shin S, Cha HJ, Lee EM, Jung JH, Lee SJ, Park IC, Jin YW, An S: MicroRNAs are significantly influenced by p53 and radiation in HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2009, 34 (6): 1645-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munekazu Y, Marcella F, Lowenstein CJ: MiR-34a repression of SIRT1 regulates apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (36): 13421-13426. 10.1073/pnas.0801613105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu D, Takeshita F, Hino Y, Fukunaga S, Kudo Y, Tamaki A, Matsunaga J, Takahashi R-U, Takata T, Shimamoto A, Ochiya T, Tahara H: miR-22 represses cancer progression by inducing cellular senescence. J Cell Biol. 2011, 193 (2): 409-424. 10.1083/jcb.201010100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akao Y, Noguchi S, Iio A, Kojima K, Takagi T, Naoe T: Dysregulation of microRNA-34a expression causes drug-resistance to 5-FU in human colon cancer DLD-1 cells. Cancer Lett. 2011, 300 (2): 197-204. 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eades G, Yao Y, Yang M, Zhang Y, Chumsri S, Zhou Q: miR-200a regulates SIRT1 expression and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like transformation in mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (29): 25992-6002. 10.1074/jbc.M111.229401.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strum JC, Johnson JH, Ward J, Xie H, Feild J, Hester A, Alford A, Waters KM: MicroRNA 132 Regulates Nutritional Stress-Induced Chemokine Production through Repression of SirT1. Mol Endocrinol. 2009, 23: 11876-1884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kheir TB, Futoma-Kazmierczak E, Jacobsen A, Krogh A, Bardram L, Hother C, Grønbæk K, Federspiel B, Lund AH, Friis-Hansen L: miR-449 inhibits cell proliferation and is down-regulated in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2011, 10: 29-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saunders LR, Sharma AD, Tawney J, Nakagawa M, Okita K, Yamanaka S, Willenbring H, Verdin E: miRNAs regulate SIRT1 expression during mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation and in adult mouse tissues. Aging (Albany NY). 2010, 2 (7): 415-431.Google Scholar
- Saito Y, Liang G, Egger G, Friedman JM, Chuang JC, Coetzee GA, Jones PA: Specific activation of microRNA-127 with downregulation of the proto-oncogene BCL6 by chromatin-modifying drugs in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2006, 9 (6): 435-43. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Landis-Piwowar KR, Huo C, Chen D, Milacic V, Shi G, Chan TH, Dou QP: A novel prodrug of the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a potential anticancer agent. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (9): 4303-10. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Liu L, Tollefsbol TO: Glucose restriction can extend normal cell lifespan and impair precancerous cell growth through epigenetic control of hTERT and p16 expression. FASEB J. 2010, 24 (5): 1442-53. 10.1096/fj.09-149328.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paluszczak J, Krajka-Kuźniak V, Baer-Dubowska W: The effect of dietary polyphenols on the epigenetic regulation of gene expression in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Toxicol Lett. 2010, 192 (2): 119-25. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parker L, Taylor D, Kesterson J, Metzinger D, Gercel-Taylor C: Modulation of microRNA associated with ovarian cancer cells by genistein. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009, 30: 616-621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun Q, Cong R, Yan H, Gu H, Zeng Y, Liu N, Chen J, Wang B: Genistein inhibits growth of human uveal melanoma cells and affects microRNA-27a and target gene expression. Oncol Rep. 2009, 22: 563-567.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, VandenBoom T, Kong D, Wang Z, Ali S, Philip P, Sarkar F: Up-regulation of miR-200 and let-7 by natural agents leads to the reversal of epithelial-tomesenchymal transition in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 6704-6712. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, Cao Y, Sun J, Zhang Y: Curcumin reduces the expression of Bcl-2 by upregulating miR-15a and miR-16 in MCF-7 cells. Med Oncol. 2010, 27: 1114-8. 10.1007/s12032-009-9344-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meeran SM, Ahmed A, Tollefsbol TO: Epigenetic targets of bioactive dietary components for cancer prevention and therapy. Clin Epigenetics. 2010, 1 (3–4): 101-116.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy TM, Tollefsbol TO: Epigenetic diet: impact on the epigenome and cancer. Epigenomics. 2011, 3 (4): 503-518. 10.2217/epi.11.71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.